Transfer Pricing in the United States
The library on BEPS and Transfer Pricing is available here.
Transfer Pricing in the United States
1.482-1 – Allocation of income and deductions among taxpayers
1.482-1T Allocation of income and deductions among taxpayers (temporary).
1.482-2 – Determination of taxable income in specific situations
1.482-3 – Methods to determine taxable income in connection with a transfer of tangible property
1.482-4 – Methods to determine taxable income in connection with a transfer of intangible property
1.482-5 – Comparable profits method
1.482-6 – Profit split method
1.482-7 – Methods to determine taxable income in connection with a cost sharing arrangement
1.482-8 – Examples of the best method rule
1.482-9 – Methods to determine taxable income in connection with a controlled services transaction
Section 6662 IRC (www.gop.gov) and section 1.6662 CFR (www.ecfr.gov) contain penalties that may be applicable to transfer pricing transactions. Section 6662 IRC prescribes the imposition of an accuracy-related penalty on underpayments that may apply to any transfer pricing adjustment as per section 482 IRC and section 1.482 CFR.
Section 1.6662-6 CFR applies to transactions between persons described in section 482 and net section 482 transfer price adjustments. Section 6662 IRC prescribes penalties for “any underpayment which is attributable to 1 or more of the following:
(1) Negligence or disregard of rules or regulations.
(2) Any substantial understatement of income tax.
(3) Any substantial valuation misstatement under chapter 1 [of the IRC].
(4) Any substantial overstatement of pension liabilities.
(5) Any substantial estate or gift tax valuation understatement.”
IRS Internal Revenue Manual (IRM)
The IRS Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) is available here.
The IRS has also published a « Transfer Pricing Audit Roadmap » available here. To see the Canada Revenue Agency Audit Manual The IRS explains:
« The Transfer Pricing Audit Roadmap (Roadmap) is a practical, user-friendly toolkit organized around a notional 24 month audit time-line.
The Roadmap provides recommended audit procedures and links to useful reference material. It is not intended as a template. Every transfer pricing case is unique and requires ongoing exercise of judgment and discretion. With the release of the Roadmap, TPO is providing the public with insight into what to expect during a transfer pricing examination. This transparency is intended to help improve communications and efficiency, for the benefit of both the IRS and taxpayers. »
The « Transfer Pricing Audit Roadmap » states :
« Transfer pricing cases are usually won and lost on the facts. The key in transfer pricing cases is to put together a compelling story of what drives the taxpayer’s financial success, based on a thorough analysis of functions, assets, and risks, and an accurate understanding of the relevant financial information. Fact development is the “bread and butter” of our exam teams – it’s what they are trained for and good at. An effective story explains the taxpayer’s value chain, competitive position in its industry, and financial results, in a clear and compelling fashion. If indications are that the tax result claimed by the taxpayer is at odds with common sense and economic reality – “too good to be true” – chances are it is a good candidate for further scrutiny. Early identification and aggressive pursuit of cases that have this potential is important. Conversely, if indications are that the taxpayer’s financial results are reasonable, and the taxpayer’s method fits its fact profile, it may not be worth pursuing the issue. »
« Effective presentation can make or break a case. Even a strong position may not be sustained on review if it is not presented clearly and persuasively. A Notice of Proposed Adjustment (NOPA) should have logical structure, and should weave the facts and applicable legal and economic principles together in a story-line that resonates with the reader. All of the relevant facts – good and bad – should be addressed. The conclusion should come across as “inevitable.” This sort of presentation lends credibility to the proposed adjustment, and increases the odds of early resolution or sustention on review. »
The rest of the Transfer Pricing Audit Roadmap gives tools to the IRS auditor.
See also the IRS’ International Practice Units below
Filing / Reporting
Internal Revenue Bulletin 2017-7, Rev. Proc. 2017–23 (February 13, 2017)
Internal Revenue Bulletin, 2016-29 T.D. 9773 (July 18, 2016)
APA Program and MAP Program
OECD MAP Peer Review Report for the United States (September 26, 2017)
U.S. Customs and Border Protection: Rulings and Legal Decisions
IRS: FIN 48
- FASB Interpretation No. 48, « Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes »
- FIN 48 Implications – LB&I Field Examiners’ Guide
- Frequently Asked Questions about FIN 48
- FIN 48 and Tax Accrual Workpaper (TAW) Policy Update LMSB Commissioner Memorandum dated May 10, 2007
- AM 2007-0012 FIN 48 & Tax Accrual Workpapers
- Expedited Resolution of Uncertain Tax Positions – LMSB Initiative to Address Certain Implications of FIN 48
- 2016 APMA Statutory Report
- 2015 APMA Statutory Report
- 2014 APMA Statutory Report
- 2013 APMA Statutory Report
- 2012 APMA Statutory Report
- 2011 APMA Statutory Report
- 2010 APA Statutory Report (Announcement 2011-22)
- 2009 APA Statutory Report (Announcement 2010-21)
- 2008 APA Statutory Report (Announcement 2009-28)
- 2007 APA Statutory Report (Announcement 2008-27)
- 2006 APA Statutory Report (Announcement 2007-31)
- 2005 APA Statutory Report (Announcement 2006-22)
- 2004 APA Statutory Report (Announcement 2005-27)
- 2003 APA Statutory Report (Announcement 2004-26)
- 2002 APA Statutory Report (Announcement 2003-19)
- 2001 APA Statutory Report (Announcement 2002-40)
- 2000 APA Statutory Report (Announcement 2001-32)
- 1991-99 APA Statutory Report (Announcement 2000-35)