Knowledge Base Help Center
< All Topics
Print

Transfer Pricing in Brazil

Brazil’s transfer pricing landscape has undergone a fundamental transformation with the implementation of Law 14,596/2023, marking the country’s decisive shift from a unique fixed margin system to internationally recognized arm’s length principles 1. This paradigmatic change represents one of the most significant tax policy developments in Latin America’s largest economy, bringing Brazilian transfer pricing rules into alignment with OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for the first time since the original legislation was enacted in 1996 2.

The Brazilian Federal Revenue Service (Receita Federal do Brasil – RFB) has implemented comprehensive regulations through Normative Instruction 2,161/2023, establishing detailed procedures for multinational enterprises operating in Brazil 3. These changes affect all controlled transactions between Brazilian entities and their foreign related parties, fundamentally altering how transfer prices are determined, documented, and audited in the Brazilian tax system.

Historical Evolution of Brazilian Transfer Pricing Rules

The Fixed Margin Era (1996-2023)

Brazil’s transfer pricing journey began with Law 9,430/1996, which established a system based on predetermined fixed margins rather than the arm’s length principle adopted by most developed countries 4. Under this historical framework, Brazilian entities could select from limited methods including Comparable Independent Prices (PIC), Resale Price Less Profit (PRL), and Cost Plus Profit (CPL), with margins predetermined by law rather than market analysis 5.

The PRL method, for instance, applied fixed margins of 20% for goods imported and resold without industrial processing, while a 60% margin applied to goods undergoing further manufacturing in Brazil 6. This approach prioritized administrative simplicity over economic accuracy, creating systematic distortions in profit allocation that often favored foreign entities over Brazilian operations 7.

Legislative Amendments and Refinements

Throughout its 27-year existence, the fixed margin system underwent multiple amendments designed to address specific shortcomings while maintaining its fundamental structure 8. Law 9,959/2000 introduced the first refinements, followed by Law 10,451/2002 and Law 11,727/2008, each addressing particular aspects of the methodology without fundamentally altering its predetermined margin approach 9.

The most significant pre-OECD reform occurred through Law 12,715/2012, which introduced sector-specific margins and enhanced the comparable independent price method for certain commodity transactions 10. However, these modifications failed to address the fundamental disconnect between Brazilian rules and international standards, creating persistent double taxation issues for multinational enterprises with Brazilian operations.

OECD Convergence Initiative

Recognition of these systemic issues led to the launch of a joint OECD-Brazil transfer pricing project in February 2018, aimed at analyzing differences between Brazilian rules and OECD standards 11. The project culminated in the December 2019 publication of “Transfer Pricing in Brazil: Towards Convergence with the OECD Standard,” which identified two potential convergence options while preserving beneficial aspects of the Brazilian system 12.

Current Legal Framework Under Law 14,596/2023

Arm’s Length Principle Implementation

Law 14,596/2023, enacted on June 15, 2023, establishes the arm’s length principle as the foundational concept for Brazilian transfer pricing 13. Article 7 of the law explicitly requires that controlled transactions reflect terms and conditions that would be agreed upon between independent parties under comparable circumstances 14.

The legislation mandates comprehensive analysis of economically relevant characteristics, including contractual terms, functions performed, assets used, risks assumed, and business strategies 15. This represents a fundamental departure from the mechanical application of fixed margins, requiring detailed economic analysis to support transfer pricing positions.

Scope and Application

The new rules apply to all legal entities domiciled in Brazil, including branches and business units, regardless of their tax regime (actual profit, presumed profit, or arbitrated profit) 16. Coverage extends beyond traditional related party transactions to include dealings with entities in low-tax jurisdictions or those benefiting from privileged tax regimes as defined by Brazilian law 17.

Controlled transactions encompass goods, services, rights, and financial arrangements, with specific provisions for intangibles, intragroup services, cost-sharing arrangements, and business restructurings 18. The legislation also introduces comprehensive rules for centralized treasury management and insurance contracts within multinational groups.

Regulatory Implementation

RFB Normative Instruction 2,161/2023, published on September 29, 2023, provides detailed implementation guidance for Law 14,596/2023 19. The instruction establishes procedural requirements, documentation standards, and enforcement mechanisms while incorporating OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines as subsidiary interpretation sources where they do not conflict with Brazilian law 20.

Transfer Pricing Methods and Selection Criteria

Traditional Transaction Methods

Brazilian transfer pricing now recognizes five primary methods aligned with OECD standards, categorized into traditional transaction methods and transactional profit methods 21. Traditional methods receive preference when reliable data permits their application, consistent with international best practices.

The Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method remains the most direct approach, comparing controlled transaction prices with those charged between independent parties in comparable circumstances 22. For commodity transactions, Article 12 of Law 14,596/2023 establishes CUP as the most appropriate method when reliable independent prices exist, though this preference can be overcome if another method better reflects arm’s length conditions 23.

The Resale Price Method (RPM) applies to distribution operations, starting with the price charged to unrelated customers and working backward to determine an appropriate transfer price 24. Unlike the historical PRL method with fixed 20% or 60% margins, the new RPM requires market-based analysis of comparable gross margins earned by independent distributors performing similar functions under similar circumstances.

Cost Plus Method (CPM) suits manufacturing and service provision arrangements, adding an appropriate markup to costs incurred by the tested party 25. The method requires identification of comparable companies or transactions to establish arm’s length markup percentages, replacing the predetermined margins of the former CPL method.

Transactional Profit Methods

When traditional methods cannot be reliably applied, Brazilian law permits use of transactional profit methods, specifically the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) and Profit Split Method (PSM) 26. TNMM examines net profit margins relative to an appropriate base (sales, costs, or assets), while PSM allocates combined profits based on each party’s contribution to value creation.

PSM applies particularly to highly integrated operations involving unique intangibles or shared risks where traditional methods prove inadequate 27. The method requires detailed functional analysis and reliable profit allocation keys, making it suitable for complex arrangements such as global trading operations or shared development of valuable intangibles.

Method Selection and Hierarchy

Brazilian law does not establish a rigid hierarchy of methods but requires selection of the most appropriate method based on the facts and circumstances of each controlled transaction 28. Taxpayers must demonstrate why their chosen method provides the most reliable measure of arm’s length results, considering the availability and reliability of data, the degree of comparability, and the nature of the controlled transaction.

Documentation Requirements and Compliance Obligations

Master File and Local File

Law 14,596/2023 introduces comprehensive documentation requirements aligned with OECD Action 13 standards, including Master File and Local File obligations for qualifying multinational groups 29. The Master File provides standardized information about the MNE group’s organizational structure, business operations, intangibles, financial activities, and tax positions 30.

Master File requirements apply to multinational groups with consolidated revenues exceeding EUR 750 million, consistent with OECD BEPS Action 13 thresholds 31. Brazilian entities within qualifying groups must file the Master File by the last day of December following the fiscal year to which it relates, with penalties for late or inadequate filing.

The Local File contains detailed information about controlled transactions involving the Brazilian entity, including descriptions of controlled transactions, financial information, and supporting documentation 32. Local File obligations apply to Brazilian entities engaged in controlled transactions exceeding specified thresholds, ensuring comprehensive documentation of transfer pricing policies and their economic justification.

Economic Analysis Documentation

Beyond Master and Local Files, Brazilian entities must maintain detailed economic analysis supporting their transfer pricing positions 33. This includes functional analysis identifying functions performed, assets used, and risks assumed by each party, comparability analysis demonstrating arm’s length nature of pricing, and selection and application of the most appropriate transfer pricing method.

Documentation must be contemporaneous, prepared by the time the controlled transaction is undertaken, and regularly updated to reflect changing business circumstances 34. The requirement for contemporaneous documentation represents a significant change from the historical system, where transfer pricing positions could be established retroactively based on predetermined margins.

Record Keeping and Retention

Brazilian law requires maintenance of transfer pricing documentation for five years following the end of the calendar year to which it relates 35. Documentation must be available in Portuguese and readily accessible to RFB auditors upon request during tax examinations or compliance reviews.

Supporting documentation includes contracts, invoices, financial statements, economic studies, and any other materials relevant to determining arm’s length prices 36. Electronic record keeping is permitted provided documents remain accessible and readable throughout the retention period.

Penalty Structure and Enforcement Mechanisms

Primary and Secondary Adjustments

Brazilian transfer pricing enforcement distinguishes between primary adjustments affecting taxable income and secondary adjustments addressing deemed constructive distributions 37. Primary adjustments increase or decrease the IRPJ and CSLL tax bases to reflect arm’s length pricing, while secondary adjustments treat excess amounts as constructive loans subject to annual 12% interest.

The legislation provides three types of adjustments: spontaneous adjustments made by taxpayers in their returns, compensatory adjustments correcting transfer prices during the tax year, and primary adjustments imposed by tax authorities following audits 38. Compensatory adjustments must be made by year-end and properly documented to avoid subsequent penalties.

Penalty Rates and Maximum Amounts

Transfer pricing violations carry substantial penalties under the new regime, though with enhanced flexibility compared to the historical system 39. Standard transfer pricing adjustments incur penalties up to 75% of additional tax due, but taxpayers can avoid penalties by accepting proposed adjustments at the conclusion of audits.

Documentation violations carry specific penalties based on the nature and severity of non-compliance 40. Late filing of transfer pricing documentation incurs monthly penalties of 0.2% of gross revenue for the relevant period, while inadequate documentation carries a 3% penalty on gross revenue. All penalties are subject to a maximum of BRL 5 million per violation.

Audit Procedures and Defense Rights

RFB transfer pricing audits follow a structured approach beginning with factual review of transactions, agreements, and supporting documentation 41. Tax authorities then apply legal analysis to determine whether transfer prices comply with arm’s length requirements, issuing formal assessments where violations are identified.

Unlike other tax matters, transfer pricing disputes offer unique resolution opportunities 42. Taxpayers can accept transfer pricing adjustments proposed by auditors without incurring penalties, providing incentive for cooperative resolution of disputes rather than protracted litigation.

Advanced Pricing Agreements and Certainty Measures

APA Program Development

Brazil has introduced a formal Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) program allowing taxpayers to obtain prospective certainty regarding transfer pricing methodologies 43. The program enables multinational enterprises to negotiate binding agreements with RFB covering appropriate transfer pricing methods for future transactions, reducing compliance costs and audit risks.

APA applications require detailed submission packages including descriptions of controlled transactions, proposed methodologies, economic analysis, and critical assumptions underlying the pricing approach 44. RFB evaluates applications based on arm’s length principles rather than predetermined margins, ensuring APA terms reflect market-based outcomes.

Bilateral and Multilateral Arrangements

Brazilian APAs can be unilateral (involving only Brazil) or bilateral/multilateral (involving Brazil and treaty partners) 45. Bilateral APAs provide enhanced certainty by coordinating positions between tax authorities, reducing risks of double taxation arising from conflicting transfer pricing positions.

The APA program complements Brazil’s expanding treaty network and mutual agreement procedure capabilities, providing taxpayers with multiple avenues for achieving transfer pricing certainty 46. Successful APA programs typically require 12-24 months for completion, depending on transaction complexity and authority resources.

Safe Harbors and Simplification Measures

Brazilian law authorizes RFB to establish safe harbor rules for low-risk transactions, providing simplified compliance approaches for qualifying arrangements 47. Safe harbors typically apply to routine functions with limited risk profiles, allowing taxpayers to apply predetermined margins or simplified methodologies without detailed economic analysis.

The historical system included limited safe harbors such as the 5% deviation tolerance and export threshold exemptions 48. The new framework provides authority for expanded safe harbors aligned with OECD recommendations, though specific rules await further regulatory development.

Special Considerations for Specific Transaction Types

Commodity Transactions

Brazilian law provides specific guidance for commodity transactions, recognizing their unique characteristics and pricing mechanisms 49. Article 12 of Law 14,596/2023 establishes CUP as the most appropriate method for commodities when reliable independent prices exist, including quoted prices or prices from unrelated party transactions.

Commodity transfer pricing analysis must consider the functions, assets, and risks of each party in the value chain, potentially supporting use of alternative methods where CUP proves inappropriate 50. This flexibility addresses concerns that rigid CUP application might not reflect the commercial reality of integrated commodity operations.

Brazilian commodity exporters benefit from simplified approaches recognizing the transparent pricing mechanisms prevalent in agricultural and mineral commodity markets 51. However, value-added processing operations require more detailed analysis using traditional transfer pricing methods.

Intangible Property Transactions

The new framework introduces comprehensive rules for intangible property transactions, incorporating OECD guidance on Development, Enhancement, Maintenance, Protection, and Exploitation (DEMPE) functions 52. Intangible transfer pricing analysis must identify entities performing DEMPE functions and allocate returns accordingly, rather than mechanically applying predetermined margins.

Brazilian law addresses both routine and unique intangibles, with specific provisions for hard-to-value intangibles lacking reliable comparables 53. Cost-sharing arrangements receive detailed treatment, requiring arm’s length allocation of costs and returns based on expected benefits from intangible development.

Royalty payments to related parties in low-tax jurisdictions remain deductible provided they comply with arm’s length requirements, representing a significant change from previous restrictions 54. This modification eliminates a major source of double taxation for multinational enterprises with Brazilian operations.

Financial Transactions

Financial transaction pricing under the new system requires comprehensive analysis of credit ratings, collateral, guarantees, and other factors affecting arm’s length interest rates 55. The historical LIBOR + 3% approach is replaced by market-based analysis considering the borrower’s creditworthiness and transaction-specific characteristics.

Intragroup guarantee fees, previously subject to limited guidance, now require detailed analysis of guarantee benefits and comparable market rates 56. Implicit guarantees arising from group membership receive specific attention, ensuring appropriate compensation for guarantee providers.

Centralized treasury arrangements common in multinational groups require careful documentation of functions performed and risks assumed by treasury centers 57. Treasury operations must demonstrate arm’s length returns commensurate with functions performed and risks assumed, avoiding artificial profit concentration.

Practical Implementation Challenges and Considerations

Comparability Analysis and Database Limitations

Implementation of market-based transfer pricing in Brazil faces significant challenges related to comparability analysis and database availability 58. Brazilian companies often struggle to identify reliable local comparables due to limited public company data and underdeveloped commercial databases.

International databases provide broader comparable company populations but require careful consideration of economic differences between Brazil and other markets 59. Currency fluctuations, regulatory differences, and market maturity variations necessitate robust comparability adjustments to ensure reliable benchmarking results.

The transition from predetermined margins to market-based analysis requires significant capability building within both taxpayer organizations and RFB 60. Economic consultants and transfer pricing specialists play increasingly important roles in developing defensible analyses meeting Brazilian requirements.

Integration with Other Tax Obligations

Brazilian transfer pricing compliance must coordinate with customs valuation, thin capitalization rules, and other tax obligations affecting cross-border transactions 61. Differences between transfer pricing and customs valuation methodologies can create conflicts requiring careful management to avoid double adjustments.

The interaction between transfer pricing adjustments and other Brazilian taxes such as PIS, COFINS, and ICMS requires detailed consideration during compliance planning 62. Transfer pricing increases affecting import costs can trigger additional indirect tax liabilities, compounding the overall tax impact of adjustments.

Year-end compensatory adjustments present particular challenges in the Brazilian quarterly tax system, requiring careful coordination with advance payment obligations and cash flow management 63. Early adopters of the new system in 2023 encountered significant complexity managing these interactions.

Technology and Process Adaptation

Successful implementation of Brazilian transfer pricing compliance requires substantial investment in technology, processes, and personnel 64. Multinational enterprises must adapt global transfer pricing systems to accommodate Brazilian-specific requirements while maintaining consistency across jurisdictions.

Data collection and management systems require enhancement to support detailed economic analysis and contemporaneous documentation requirements 65. Integration between transfer pricing, financial reporting, and tax compliance systems becomes critical for efficient operations and audit readiness.

The requirement for Portuguese-language documentation and local expertise necessitates investment in Brazilian transfer pricing capabilities 66. Global coordination between Brazilian entities and international transfer pricing teams requires clear protocols and regular communication to ensure consistent positions.

Brazil’s adoption of OECD-aligned transfer pricing rules represents a watershed moment for multinational enterprises operating in Latin America’s largest economy. The transition from fixed margins to arm’s length principles brings Brazilian practice into alignment with international standards while introducing significant compliance challenges and opportunities. Companies with Brazilian operations must adapt their transfer pricing strategies, documentation processes, and organizational capabilities to succeed under the new regime. The comprehensive nature of these changes, from method selection through penalty structures, requires careful planning and substantial investment in compliance infrastructure. Early experience with the new system suggests that proactive adaptation and robust documentation will be essential for managing transfer pricing risks in Brazil’s evolving tax environment.

Recent Economic Developments in Brazil 2024-2025

Brazil’s economy demonstrated remarkable resilience and growth throughout 2024-2025, significantly outperforming initial projections and establishing itself as a standout performer in Latin America. The country’s gross domestic product expanded by 3.4% in 2024, marking the strongest growth since the post-pandemic recovery and exceeding early forecasts that predicted growth of less than 2%. This robust performance was driven primarily by strong domestic demand, with household consumption increasing by 4.8% year-on-year, supported by a historically low unemployment rate of 6.2% – the lowest level since records began in 2012. The economy’s strength was further bolstered by a 17% surge in investment and a 7.3% increase in gross fixed capital formation, reflecting renewed business confidence and capital expansion.

However, the economic landscape faced significant headwinds as Brazil grappled with persistent inflationary pressures that exceeded the central bank’s target range. Inflation reached 4.83% by the end of 2024, surpassing both the 3% target and the 4.5% upper tolerance limit. This prompted the central bank to implement an aggressive monetary tightening cycle, raising the benchmark Selic rate from 10.75% to 14.75% through a series of six consecutive hikes. The Brazilian real also experienced substantial weakness, depreciating by 21% against the US dollar in 2024, making it the most devalued major emerging market currency. Looking ahead to 2025, economic growth is projected to moderate to approximately 2.1-2.5%, as tighter monetary conditions and fiscal constraints are expected to temper the robust domestic demand that characterized 2024.

Industry Developments in Brazil 2024-2025

Brazil’s industrial landscape experienced significant transformation and growth across multiple sectors during 2024-2025, with manufacturing leading the recovery and technological innovation driving expansion. The industrial sector grew by 3.3% in 2024, accelerating from 1.6% growth in 2023, with manufacturing industries posting an impressive 3.8% increase driven by higher output in vehicles, transport equipment, machinery, and electrical equipment. Industrial production concluded 2024 with a 3.1% increase, positioning the sector 1.3% above pre-pandemic levels, though still trailing the historical peak by 15.6%.

The automotive industry emerged as a standout performer, recording exceptional growth of 12.5% in 2024. This surge was complemented by remarkable expansion in the technology sector, where data processing, electronics, and optical equipment industries grew by 14.7%, while machinery and electrical materials increased by 12.2%. Brazil’s information technology market experienced unprecedented growth of 13.9% in 2024, significantly outpacing the global average of 10.8% and solidifying its position as Latin America’s largest IT market with 34.7% of regional investments. The sector’s expansion was driven by artificial intelligence adoption, business digitalization, and advancements in cloud computing and cybersecurity infrastructure.

The renewable energy sector achieved remarkable milestones, with wind and solar power generating 24% of Brazil’s electricity in 2024, contributing to an overall renewable energy matrix of 88.2%. Agriculture recovered strongly from 2024’s climate challenges, with projections indicating a record harvest of 328.4 million tons in 2025, representing a 12.2% increase from the previous year. Brazil’s e-commerce sector continued its rapid expansion, driven by changing consumer behaviors and technological advancements. Mining experienced notable growth in base metals, particularly copper and nickel, supported by robust global demand for renewable energy applications and electric vehicle components.

  1. Brazil, OECD-aligned transfer pricing rules signed by president, KPMG, 2023
  2. Brazilian transfer pricing rules signed by president, EY Switzerland, 2024
  3. New Transfer Pricing rules in Brazil, Grant Thornton, 2023
  4. Transfer Pricing Country Profile – Brazil, OECD, 2022
  5. Transfer Pricing Methodology in Brazil, Marcos Aurélio Pereira Valadão, CIAT, 2012
  6. Some comments on Brazilian TP System with fixed margins for the resale price method, Marcus Valadão, Tax Justice Network, 2012
  7. Transfer Pricing: UN Guidelines — Brazil, SSRN, 2013
  8. Transfer Pricing 2025 – Brazil, Chambers Practice Guides, 2025
  9. Brazil Transfer Pricing Country Summary Report 2021, TPA Global, 2021
  10. Brazilian transfer pricing rules, Tax Justice Network, Marcus Valadão
  11. Transfer Pricing Safe Harbours and Comparability, OECD, 2020
  12. Transfer Pricing in Brazil: Towards Convergence with the OECD Standard, OECD/Receita Federal do Brasil, 2019
  13. Executive order amending Brazil’s transfer pricing regime converted into law, Mattos Filho, 2023
  14. Brazil: OECD-aligned transfer pricing rules signed by president, KPMG, 2023
  15. Brazil’s New Transfer Pricing Rules Now in Effect, Forvis Mazars, 2024
  16. RFB Normative Instruction No. 2,161/2023: New Transfer Pricing rules in Brazil, Grant Thornton, 2023
  17. New Brazilian Transfer Pricing Rules, Taxand, 2024
  18. New Brazilian Transfer Pricing Guidelines, CGM Law, 2022
  19. Normative Ruling RFB No. 2161, Daniel Law, 2023
  20. Transfer Pricing in Brazil: Practical Aspects in the Adaptation of the Arm’s Length Standard, IBFD, 2023
  21. The impact of Brazil’s new OECD transfer pricing rules, Plante Moran, 2024
  22. Brazil Embraces New OECD-Based Transfer Pricing Rules, Marcum LLP, 2025
  23. Executive order amending Brazil’s transfer pricing regime converted into law, Mattos Filho, 2023
  24. Transfer Pricing Horizon in Brazil: Arm’s Length Standard and the Resale Price Less Profit Method, IBFD, 2021
  25. Transfer Pricing in Brazil, KPMG, 2024
  26. implementing brazil’s new transfer pricing rules: key challenges, Intergest, 2025
  27. New transfer pricing framework introduced in Brazil, TaxSpoc, 2024
  28. Transfer Pricing Country Profile – Brazil, OECD, 2022
  29. New Transfer Pricing Framework Introduced in Brazil, TaxSpoc, 2024
  30. Brazil’s advance pricing agreement rules would boost certainty, Bloomberg Tax, 2024
  31. Transfer Pricing and Customs Valuation Rules in Brazil: A Challenging Reconciliation, Kluwer Law, 2023
  32. Brazil Transfer Pricing Rules & Compliance, Commenda, 2025
  33. Changes to Brazilian Transfer Pricing Rules, WTS, 2023
  34. Brazil adopts OECD-aligned transfer pricing rules effective 2024, Forvis Mazars, 2024
  35. Transfer Pricing Control Rules, Normative Instruction 2,161/2023
  36. Providing Better Price Signals Through Fuel Taxation: Opportunities in Brazil’s Consumption Tax Reform, World Bank, 2024
  37. Brazil: Changes to Brazilian Transfer Pricing Rules, WTS, 2023
  38. New transfer pricing rules in Brazil, EY Switzerland, 2024
  39. Navigating Brazil’s New Transfer Pricing Landscape, Skadden YouTube, 2025
  40. New transfer pricing rules in Brazil, EY Switzerland, 2024
  41. Navigating Brazil’s New Transfer Pricing Landscape, Skadden YouTube, 2025
  42. Brazil’s advance pricing agreement rules would boost certainty, Bloomberg Tax, 2024
  43. Brazil’s advance pricing agreement rules would boost certainty, Bloomberg Tax, 2024
  44. Preços de transferência e margens de lucro alternativas, FGV Repository
  45. The Arm’s Length Principle in Mitigating Tax Avoidance, IJABIM, 2025
  46. Cross-Border Data Privacy and Legal Support, AJSRI, 2025
  47. Finding a safe harbour in Brazil, International Tax Review
  48. Transfer Pricing Safe Harbours and Comparability, OECD, 2020
  49. Precios de Transferencia en Commodities, TP Consulting, 2025
  50. Executive order amending Brazil’s transfer pricing regime converted into law, Mattos Filho, 2023
  51. New Legislation Changes the Landscape of Transfer Pricing in Commodities in Brazil, TP Consulting, 2025
  52. New Brazilian Transfer Pricing Guidelines, CGM Law, 2022
  53. Brazil Transfer Pricing Rules & Compliance, Commenda, 2025
  54. Brazil: OECD-aligned transfer pricing rules signed by president, KPMG, 2023
  55. New transfer pricing rules in Brazil, EY Switzerland, 2024
  56. Performance Guarantee: How to Avoid Pitfalls and Overcome Hindrances in a Transfer Pricing Analysis, IBFD, 2022
  57. implementing brazil’s new transfer pricing rules: key challenges, Intergest, 2025
  58. implementing brazil’s new transfer pricing rules: key challenges, Intergest, 2025
  59. The impact of Brazil’s new OECD transfer pricing rules, Plante Moran, 2024
  60. Transfer Pricing in Brazil, KPMG, 2024
  61. Transfer Pricing and Customs Valuation Rules in Brazil: A Challenging Reconciliation, Kluwer Law, 2023
  62. The impact of Brazil’s new OECD transfer pricing rules, Plante Moran, 2024
  63. Transfer Pricing in Brazil, KPMG, 2024
  64. The role of digitalization of transfer pricing in the company’s management accounting system, IJAEFA, 2023
  65. Brazil adopts OECD-aligned transfer pricing rules effective 2024, Forvis Mazars, 2024
  66. New Transfer Pricing Framework Introduced in Brazil, TaxSpoc, 2024
Tags:
Table of Contents