Knowledge Base Help Center
< All Topics
Print

Value Chain Analysis for Transfer Pricing

The evolution of international transfer pricing regulation has fundamentally transformed how multinational enterprises (MNEs) approach intercompany pricing, with value chain analysis (VCA) emerging as a critical tool for ensuring compliance with modern regulatory requirements 1. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) initiative has positioned VCA at the center of transfer pricing analysis, requiring MNEs to demonstrate that their profit allocation aligns with genuine value creation activities 2. This comprehensive guide provides practical methodologies for conducting robust value chain analysis that meets contemporary regulatory standards while supporting business decision-making.

Understanding Value Chain Analysis in Transfer Pricing Context

Value chain analysis represents a systematic examination of how MNEs create value through their global operations, identifying the specific functions, assets, and risks that contribute to profit generation across different jurisdictions 3. Unlike traditional transfer pricing approaches that focus on individual transactions, VCA adopts a holistic perspective that examines the entire business model to determine where value is genuinely created and how profits should be allocated accordingly 4.

The BEPS Actions 8-10 reports fundamentally redefined transfer pricing requirements by emphasizing that profit allocation must reflect actual value creation rather than contractual arrangements alone 5. This paradigm shift requires MNEs to conduct comprehensive analysis of their global operations, moving beyond simple benchmarking exercises to examine the economic substance underlying their business arrangements 6.

Value chain analysis creates context for pricing transactions between entities by assessing the relative contributions made by each entity to the overall business 7. The methodology helps companies holistically review their value chain and assess alignment with current transfer pricing arrangements while providing a foundation to efficiently meet global transfer pricing requirements 8.

Regulatory Framework Evolution and Impact

The regulatory landscape governing value chain analysis has evolved significantly over the past three decades, with key developments reshaping how MNEs approach transfer pricing documentation and compliance 9. The foundational OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines established in 1995 introduced functional analysis concepts that form the bedrock of modern VCA methodologies 10.

The BEPS Actions 8-10 implementation between 2015-2017 marked a watershed moment, mandating that transfer pricing outcomes align with value creation activities rather than artificial contractual structures 11. Simultaneously, BEPS Action 13 introduced the three-tier documentation approach, requiring MNEs to provide comprehensive value chain descriptions in their Master Files 12.

The 2017 introduction of the DEMPE framework (Development, Enhancement, Maintenance, Protection, and Exploitation) specifically addressed intangible asset valuation within value chains, ensuring that entities performing these functions receive appropriate compensation 13. The DEMPE concept was first introduced in the final Actions 8–10 report, released on October 5th 2015 by the OECD under its base erosion and profit shifting initiative 14.

Recent updates to the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines have incorporated guidance on Amount B of Pillar One, providing a simplified and streamlined approach to the application of the arm’s length principle to baseline marketing and distribution activities 15. This development is particularly helpful for low-capacity jurisdictions seeking to implement transfer pricing requirements effectively.

Fundamental Methodological Approaches

Contemporary VCA implementation typically employs one of two primary methodological approaches: empirical VCA or formulaic VCA, each offering distinct advantages depending on the specific circumstances of the MNE group 16. Empirical VCA relies heavily on third-party market data and classical transfer pricing techniques to develop insights into value creation, utilizing the structure-conduct-performance paradigm and core competency frameworks 17.

The empirical approach involves four primary phases: peer analysis to identify sustainable competitive advantages, core competencies analysis to understand value drivers, entity mapping to assign functions and risks, and evaluation of results to ensure arm’s length compliance 18. This methodology particularly benefits MNEs operating in industries with robust comparable data and established benchmarking practices 19.

Formulaic VCA approaches, while less dependent on external market data, require careful design to ensure compliance with arm’s length principles and avoid mechanical profit allocation that may not reflect genuine economic contributions 20. The selection between these approaches depends on factors including data availability, industry characteristics, and the specific regulatory environment in which the MNE operates 21.

Step-by-Step Implementation Process

Successful VCA implementation requires a structured, phased approach that ensures comprehensive analysis while maintaining operational efficiency and regulatory compliance 22. The implementation process typically spans 12-24 months and involves multiple stakeholder groups across different business functions 23.

Phase 1: Scoping and Planning

The initial scoping phase establishes the foundation for successful VCA implementation by defining clear objectives, assembling appropriate project teams, and conducting preliminary risk assessments 24. Project scope definition must consider the breadth of business operations, geographic footprint, and specific regulatory requirements across relevant jurisdictions 25. Establishing governance structures with clear roles and responsibilities ensures effective coordination between tax, legal, finance, and operational teams throughout the implementation process 26.

Preliminary risk assessment identifies potential transfer pricing exposures and prioritizes areas requiring detailed analysis 27. This assessment should consider factors including historical transfer pricing positions, recent regulatory changes, and potential areas of tax authority scrutiny 28.

Phase 2: Information Gathering

Comprehensive information gathering forms the empirical foundation of robust VCA, requiring systematic collection of both qualitative and quantitative data across all business functions 29. Management interviews and functional surveys capture detailed information about activities performed, decisions made, and risks assumed by different entities within the MNE group 30.

Financial data collection involves gathering entity-level financial statements, transaction volumes, and profitability metrics that enable quantitative analysis of value contribution 31. Legal structure mapping documents ownership relationships, contractual arrangements, and formal risk allocation agreements, providing the foundation for comparing contractual terms with actual business conduct 32.

The first step in conducting a functional analysis is to gather relevant information about the parties involved in the controlled transaction, including organizational structure and business models, contractual agreements and intercompany arrangements, financial data and accounting records, operational processes and value chains, and industry-specific factors and market conditions 33.

Phase 3: Value Chain Mapping

Value chain mapping represents the analytical core of VCA implementation, involving detailed Functions, Assets, and Risks (FAR) analysis across all entities within the MNE group 34. This phase identifies specific activities that contribute to value creation, tangible and intangible assets employed in business operations, and risks assumed by different entities 35.

The mapping of the value chain is obtained through a series of value focused interviews with key personnel and a review of internal and external data 36. This process involves preparing an ‘activity map’ capturing activities across the value chain, identifying all intellectual property assets and key risks and mapping them to activities, and preparing supporting materials including functional analysis 37.

For intangible assets, detailed DEMPE analysis identifies entities responsible for development, enhancement, maintenance, protection, and exploitation activities 38. Value driver identification establishes the hierarchy of activities that generate sustainable competitive advantages and economic returns for the MNE group 39.

DEMPE Analysis for Intangible Assets

The DEMPE framework provides a systematic approach for analyzing intangible asset value creation within MNE groups, ensuring that entities performing value-creating functions receive appropriate compensation 40. Development functions encompass research and development activities, initial concept creation, and prototype development that establish the foundational value of intangible assets 41.

Enhancement activities involve ongoing improvements, technology upgrades, and feature additions that increase the value and market competitiveness of existing intangibles 42. Maintenance functions ensure the continued viability and effectiveness of intangible assets through technical support, quality assurance, and documentation updates 43.

Protection activities encompass legal measures to safeguard intangible asset rights, including patent and trademark filing, enforcement actions, and compliance monitoring 44. Exploitation functions involve the commercial deployment of intangibles through product commercialization, licensing agreements, and market development activities 45.

DEMPE is designed to help both taxpayers (including MNEs) and tax authorities achieve an accurate assessment of transactions to help with the determination of appropriate transfer pricing 46. There are three factors to consider when determining who is performing what function: control, funding, and risk 47. Per DEMPE function it should be determined who has control, who is funding, and who is incurring the risks related to the function 48.

Documentation Requirements and Compliance

Modern transfer pricing documentation requirements mandate comprehensive value chain disclosure through the three-tier approach established by BEPS Action 13 49. Master File preparation requires detailed description of the MNE group’s organizational structure, business activities, and value creation processes 50.

The Master File must include comprehensive business descriptions that identify principal value drivers and explain how different business activities contribute to overall profitability 51. The transfer pricing master file is prepared at group level, whereas local files are prepared at company or country level, and the master file must be consistent with the local files 52.

Intangible asset documentation requires detailed DEMPE analysis and explanation of how development, enhancement, maintenance, protection, and exploitation activities are allocated across different entities 53. Local File requirements demand entity-specific analysis that demonstrates how individual entities contribute to the broader value chain while supporting specific transfer pricing positions 54.

The documentation which is required to be held by taxpayers shall be in line with Chapter V of the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines, including both Master file and Local file requirements 55. The documentation must establish clear linkages between Master File value chain descriptions and Local File transaction analysis to ensure consistency and regulatory compliance 56.

More than 115 jurisdictions have introduced legislation to impose a country-by-country reporting obligation on multinational entity groups, applicable to almost all MNE groups with consolidated group revenue at or above the threshold of €750 million 57. More than 3,300 bilateral relationships for the exchange of country-by-country reports are now in place 58.

Transfer Pricing Methods in Value Chain Context

The selection and application of transfer pricing methods within VCA frameworks requires careful consideration of how different methodologies align with value creation principles and BEPS requirements 59. Traditional methods such as Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP), Resale Price Method (RPM), and Cost Plus Method (CPM) maintain relevance for specific transactions but require enhanced substance verification in the post-BEPS environment 60.

The OECD preferred and most reliable transfer pricing method is the Comparable Uncontrolled Price method, which establishes a price based on the pricing of similar transactions which have taken place between third parties or between a MNE entity and a third party 61. When the CUP cannot be utilized due to lack of sufficiently comparable transactions, the cost-plus method may be applied, which calculates the price on the basis of the cost of supplying the goods or providing the services, and adding a profit margin 62.

The Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) offers high value chain relevance when supported by comprehensive functional analysis that positions tested entities within the broader value creation framework 63. However, the Transactional Profit Split Method (TPSM) demonstrates the strongest alignment with BEPS principles by considering overall value creation and shared contributions across multiple entities 64.

The profit split method is appropriate to be used when two parties are contributing to a venture and it’s difficult to examine each party on its own 65. The TPSM proves particularly appropriate for highly integrated operations where multiple entities make unique and valuable contributions to value creation 66. The methodology requires detailed value chain mapping to identify contribution factors and establish defensible profit allocation mechanisms that reflect genuine economic substance 67.

After having performed a DEMPE analysis, it can be determined which entity is entitled to the profits resulting from an intangible asset; however, it can also be concluded that multiple entities perform considerable DEMPE functions, in which case the OECD Guidelines set out that the Profit Split Method is the most appropriate method for allocating the profits 68.

Implementation Challenges and Strategic Considerations

Successful VCA implementation confronts numerous operational and technical challenges that require careful planning and stakeholder management 69. Cross-functional coordination between tax, finance, legal, and operational teams presents ongoing communication challenges, particularly in organizations with decentralized decision-making structures 70.

Data quality and availability issues frequently constrain empirical analysis, particularly in organizations with disparate information systems or limited historical documentation 71. The dynamic nature of business operations requires ongoing monitoring and update procedures to ensure that value chain analysis remains current and reflective of actual business activities 72.

Regulatory complexity across multiple jurisdictions creates additional compliance challenges, as different tax authorities may interpret VCA requirements differently or emphasize specific aspects of the analysis 73. Effective implementation requires careful consideration of local requirements while maintaining global consistency in approach and documentation 74.

The changes brought in by the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Action Plan have the potential to radically change tax outcomes for many taxpayers, with the realignment of taxing rights with economic substance at the heart of the initiative 75. Given the experimental nature of many value chain development interventions and the strong emphasis on stakeholder ownership of the upgrading process, organizations need to be willing to risk failure and to withdraw from value chain activities that are not proving successful 76.

Functional analysis is critical to transfer pricing compliance for multinational enterprises and medium-sized businesses engaged in cross-border transactions 77. It involves a comprehensive examination of the functions performed, assets employed, and risks assumed by the parties involved in controlled transactions 78.

The practical implementation of robust VCA requires sustained organizational commitment, appropriate resource allocation, and ongoing refinement based on evolving business circumstances and regulatory developments 79. MNEs that successfully integrate value chain analysis into their transfer pricing governance frameworks position themselves to meet contemporary compliance requirements while supporting strategic business decision-making in an increasingly complex global tax environment 80.

  1. OECD, Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations, 2022, OECD Publishing
  2. OECD, Aligning Transfer Pricing Outcomes with Value Creation, Actions 8-10: 2015 Final Reports, 2015, OECD Publishing
  3. KPMG, A better perspective on your business: KPMG’s value chain analysis, 2019, KPMG LLP
  4. Deloitte, Value Chain Analysis, 2019, Deloitte Global
  5. OECD, Aligning Transfer Pricing Outcomes with Value Creation, Actions 8-10: 2015 Final Reports, 2015, OECD Publishing
  6. KPMG, A better perspective on your business: KPMG’s value chain analysis, 2019, KPMG LLP
  7. Deloitte, Value Chain Analysis, 2019, Deloitte Global
  8. Deloitte, Value Chain Analysis, 2019, Deloitte Global
  9. OECD, Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations, 2022, OECD Publishing
  10. BDO Malta, OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines, 2025, BDO Malta
  11. OECD, Aligning Transfer Pricing Outcomes with Value Creation, Actions 8-10: 2015 Final Reports, 2015, OECD Publishing
  12. Quantera Global, Transfer pricing master file, 2022, Quantera Global
  13. RoyaltyRange, DEMPE explained, 2018, RoyaltyRange
  14. Transfer Pricing web, Introduction to DEMPE functions, 2022, Transfer Pricing web
  15. OECD, Transfer pricing, 2025, OECD
  16. KPMG, A better perspective on your business: KPMG’s value chain analysis, 2019, KPMG LLP
  17. Deloitte, Value Chain Analysis, 2019, Deloitte Global
  18. KPMG, A better perspective on your business: KPMG’s value chain analysis, 2019, KPMG LLP
  19. Tax Risk Management, Guide to Functional Analysis in Transfer Pricing, 2024, Tax Risk Management
  20. Deloitte, Value Chain Analysis, 2019, Deloitte Global
  21. Taxand, Transfer Pricing Guide 2024, 2024, Taxand
  22. KPMG, A better perspective on your business: KPMG’s value chain analysis, 2019, KPMG LLP
  23. Deloitte, Value Chain Analysis, 2019, Deloitte Global
  24. Tax Risk Management, Guide to Functional Analysis in Transfer Pricing, 2024, Tax Risk Management
  25. Taxand, Transfer Pricing Guide 2024, 2024, Taxand
  26. KPMG, A better perspective on your business: KPMG’s value chain analysis, 2019, KPMG LLP
  27. Tax Risk Management, Guide to Functional Analysis in Transfer Pricing, 2024, Tax Risk Management
  28. Taxand, Transfer Pricing Guide 2024, 2024, Taxand
  29. Tax Risk Management, Guide to Functional Analysis in Transfer Pricing, 2024, Tax Risk Management
  30. RoyaltyRange, The Role of Functional Analysis in Transfer Pricing, 2025, RoyaltyRange
  31. Tax Risk Management, Guide to Functional Analysis in Transfer Pricing, 2024, Tax Risk Management
  32. RoyaltyRange, The Role of Functional Analysis in Transfer Pricing, 2025, RoyaltyRange
  33. Tax Risk Management, Guide to Functional Analysis in Transfer Pricing, 2024, Tax Risk Management
  34. KPMG, A better perspective on your business: KPMG’s value chain analysis, 2019, KPMG LLP
  35. RoyaltyRange, The Role of Functional Analysis in Transfer Pricing, 2025, RoyaltyRange
  36. KPMG, A better perspective on your business: KPMG’s value chain analysis, 2019, KPMG LLP
  37. KPMG, A better perspective on your business: KPMG’s value chain analysis, 2019, KPMG LLP
  38. RoyaltyRange, DEMPE explained, 2018, RoyaltyRange
  39. KPMG, A better perspective on your business: KPMG’s value chain analysis, 2019, KPMG LLP
  40. RoyaltyRange, DEMPE explained, 2018, RoyaltyRange
  41. Transfer Pricing web, Introduction to DEMPE functions, 2022, Transfer Pricing web
  42. Tiberghien Economics, DEMPE – Development, Enhancement, Maintenance, Protection and Exploitation, 2020, Tiberghien Economics
  43. Transfer Pricing web, Introduction to DEMPE functions, 2022, Transfer Pricing web
  44. Exactera, DEMPE For Dummies, 2023, Exactera
  45. RoyaltyRange, DEMPE explained, 2018, RoyaltyRange
  46. RoyaltyRange, DEMPE explained, 2018, RoyaltyRange
  47. Transfer Pricing web, Introduction to DEMPE functions, 2022, Transfer Pricing web
  48. Tiberghien Economics, DEMPE – Development, Enhancement, Maintenance, Protection and Exploitation, 2020, Tiberghien Economics
  49. Quantera Global, Transfer pricing master file, 2022, Quantera Global
  50. Commenda, Understanding Master and Local Files in Transfer Pricing, 2025, Commenda
  51. Quantera Global, Transfer pricing master file, 2022, Quantera Global
  52. Quantera Global, Transfer pricing master file, 2022, Quantera Global
  53. RoyaltyRange, DEMPE explained, 2018, RoyaltyRange
  54. BDO Malta, Transfer Pricing documentation, 2025, BDO Malta
  55. BDO Malta, Transfer Pricing documentation, 2025, BDO Malta
  56. Commenda, Understanding Master and Local Files in Transfer Pricing, 2025, Commenda
  57. EY, OECD releases outcomes of seventh peer review on BEPS Action 13 on CbCR, 2024, EY
  58. EY, OECD releases outcomes of seventh peer review on BEPS Action 13 on CbCR, 2024, EY
  59. BDO Malta, Transfer Pricing methods, 2025, BDO Malta
  60. BDO Malta, Transfer Pricing methods, 2025, BDO Malta
  61. BDO Malta, Transfer Pricing methods, 2025, BDO Malta
  62. BDO Malta, Transfer Pricing methods, 2025, BDO Malta
  63. BDO Malta, Transfer Pricing methods, 2025, BDO Malta
  64. Valentiam, The Profit Split Method (PSM) With Examples, 2021, Valentiam
  65. BDO Malta, Transfer Pricing methods, 2025, BDO Malta
  66. European Commission, The application of the profit split method within the EU, 2019, European Commission
  67. Valentiam, The Profit Split Method (PSM) With Examples, 2021, Valentiam
  68. Transfer Pricing web, Introduction to DEMPE functions, 2022, Transfer Pricing web
  69. KPMG, A better perspective on your business: KPMG’s value chain analysis, 2019, KPMG LLP
  70. Deloitte, Value Chain Analysis, 2019, Deloitte Global
  71. Tax Risk Management, Guide to Functional Analysis in Transfer Pricing, 2024, Tax Risk Management
  72. Taxand, Transfer Pricing Guide 2024, 2024, Taxand
  73. Taxand, Transfer Pricing Guide 2024, 2024, Taxand
  74. Deloitte, Transfer pricing rules amendments and guidelines, 2024, Deloitte Malta
  75. KPMG, A better perspective on your business: KPMG’s value chain analysis, 2019, KPMG LLP
  76. USAID, Implementation Best Practices for Value Chain Projects, 2010, USAID
  77. Tax Risk Management, Guide to Functional Analysis in Transfer Pricing, 2024, Tax Risk Management
  78. RoyaltyRange, The Role of Functional Analysis in Transfer Pricing, 2025, RoyaltyRange
  79. KPMG, A better perspective on your business: KPMG’s value chain analysis, 2019, KPMG LLP
  80. Deloitte, Value Chain Analysis, 2019, Deloitte Global
Table of Contents